Meaning negotiation in the conversation partner group occurred between the conversation leader and a partner rather than between two conversation partners¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Sentence completion was used as a means of meaning negotiation between the conversation leader and a conversation partner, not between two conversation partners, mirroring the Garcia Mayo and Pica (2000) finding. → Ranaweera 2015

Evidence¶

Ranaweera 2015¶

Mahishi Ranaweera. (2015). Interactional Feedback in Naturalistic Interaction between L2 English Learners. English Language Teaching, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n11p47

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Qualitative observation of the coded interaction in the conversation partner group. The article reports that "sentence completion was used as a means of meaning negotiation between the conversation leader and conversation partner rather than between two conversation partners".

"Similar to Garcia Mayo and Pica (2000) study, sentence completion was used as a means of meaning negotiation between the conversation leader and conversation partner rather than between two conversation partners."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Interactional feedback occurs in naturalistic learner-learner conversation outside the classroom, but at a very low frequency — related
• Meaning negotiation is the most frequent form of interactional feedback in naturalistic conversation partner interaction, and explicit correction does not occur — related