Neural coding of consonants in noise strongly predicts phonological processing in 4-year-old pre-readers over and above demographic factors¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In 4-y-old children who had not yet learned to read, a regression model of neural coding of consonants in noise predicted phonological processing above demographics (ΔR2 = 0.488, p = 0.003). → White-Schwoch T 2015
Evidence¶
White-Schwoch T 2015¶
White-Schwoch T, Woodruff Carr K, Thompson EC, Anderson S, Nicol T, Bradlow AR, et al. (2015) Auditory Processing in Noise: A Preschool Biomarker for Literacy. PLoS Biol 13(7): e1002196. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002196
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Hierarchical regression in a cohort of 37 4-y-olds (mean age 54.41 months) who had not yet learned to read; the model combined neural timing, trial-by-trial stability, and spectral-feature measures from a single FFR recording. The neural step added "ΔR2 = 0.488" over demographics, with total R2 = 0.684; no standardized effect size is printed, so impact is null.
"We found that neural coding of consonants in noise strongly predicted phonological processing in pre-readers over and above demographic factors (CELF P-2 Phonological Awareness; ΔR2 = 0.488, F[9,24] = 4.121, p = 0.003; total R2 = 0.684, F[12,36] = 4.328, p = 0.001"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The consonants-in-noise model predicts concurrent reading in school-aged children and reliably classifies externally diagnosed learning disability, being most effective at clearing children as unlikely to have an LD — related
- A consonants-in-noise model derived in 4-year-olds generalizes to predict rapid naming and sentence memory in preschoolers, though not sentence memory in 3-year-olds — related
- Preschool neurophysiological assessment predicts performance on phonological processing, rapid naming, sentence memory, sight word reading, spelling, and composite reading one year later — related
- Phoneme awareness is a stronger predictor of reading development than rhyme awareness — related
- Chronic exposure to indoor noise and reverberation at school is associated with poorer children's reading and prereading skills — related
- Use of consonantal context in vowel spelling develops gradually, emerging around age 8 and peaking around age 11 — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
neural-coding-consonants-noise-predicts-phonological-processing-prereaders |
title |
Neural coding of consonants in noise strongly predicts phonological processing in 4-year-old pre-readers over and above demographic factors |
description |
Neural coding of consonants in noise strongly predicts phonological processing in 4-year-old pre-readers over and above demographic factors |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — white-schwoch-t-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.