Most new teaching methods reduce dissatisfaction relative to LBL, with WeChat-based combinations most favoured by residents¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Ten interventions show significantly fewer dissatisfied students than LBL (ORs 0.06–0.25), and students most dislike LBL (SUCRA 0.7%). → Guan Cheng Ye 2025
Evidence¶
Guan Cheng Ye 2025¶
Guan Cheng Ye, Chun Ping Liu, Wei Li, Hua Chao Zhu, Liu Lv, Zhen Hong Zhu, Yong Hong Wang, Jie Hu, Xiao Jia Zheng, Jing Ying Fang, Yu Cao Ma, Ming Xuan Liu, Yi Wen Wang, Ying Kai Gao, Zi Yu Zhang, Lu Ming Zhao, Cun Xiang Xie, Min Yee Lim, Hai Long Wang. (2025). Effectiveness of multiple teaching methods in standardized training of internal medicine residents in China: a network meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07020-1
q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3
In the dissatisfaction NMA (42 studies, 2921 trainees), ten interventions each showed significantly fewer dissatisfied students than LBL, with printed ORs and 95% CIs as quoted; students most disliked LBL (SUCRA 0.7%).
"PBL + Wechat (OR = 0.06, 95% CI [0.01, 0.27]), TBL (OR = 0.11, 95% CI [0.02, 0.52]), CBL + Wechat (OR = 0.13, 95% CI [0.06, 0.3]), CBL + FC (OR = 0.13, 95% CI [0.02085]), PBL + MDT (OR = 0.18, 95% CI [0.06, 0.5]), PBL + CBL (OR = 0.19, 95% CI [0.12, 0.3]), CBL (OR = 0.19, 95% CI [0.08, 0.44], PBL + EBM (OR = 0.2, 95% CI [0.06, 0.65]), PBL (OR = 0.24, 95% CI [0.12, 0.47]) and PBL + CP (OR = 0.25, 95% CI [0.11, 0.59]) have significant advantages"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Cluster analysis identifies PBL + WeChat, TBL and CBL + WeChat as most promising for theoretical and practical performance with low dissatisfaction — related
- Multiple new teaching methods (PBL + CBL, CBL + WeChat, TBL, PBL, PBL + EBM, CBL) each significantly outperform LBL on theoretical scores — related
- PBL combined with WeChat outperforms LBL in theoretical test scores and reduces dissatisfaction among Chinese internal medicine residents — related
- Students in TBL groups report higher satisfaction than students in LBL groups — related
- PBL combined with clinical practice yields the largest improvement in medical record analysis scores versus LBL — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.