New network nodes were developed through field-based activities such as regional councils and faculty work groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Some ADs developed new nodes in their networks by fostering field-based pods of activity, like regional councils and faculty work groups. → Bracco 2014

Evidence¶

Bracco 2014¶

Bracco, K. R., Klarin, B., Broek, M., Austin, K., Finkelstein, N., Bugler, D., & Mundry, S. (2014). Statewide networks: Connecting education systems and stakeholders to support college readiness. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED559537

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Observation from the Year Three cross-state evaluation based on AD interviews and the four state spotlights (e.g., Tennessee's eight regional curriculum councils, Washington's faculty work groups). No effect size is printed.

"New nodes were developed through field-based activities. Some ADs sought to develop new nodes (i.e., the "actors") in their network by fostering field-based pods of activity, like regional councils and faculty work groups."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Cultivating activities in local nodes produced more tangible outcomes than statewide planning and networking — related
• Core to College network interactions were primarily information sharing and making connections between K–12 and higher education — related