The group-by-gender interaction on reading fluency was not statistically significant¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The Group * Gender interaction was non-significant (F = 1.058, Sig. 0.311), so the gender difference did not statistically depend on group membership. → Ayed H. Ziadat & Mohammad Soud A. AL-Awan 2018

Evidence¶

Ayed H. Ziadat & Mohammad Soud A. AL-Awan 2018¶

Ayed H. Ziadat & Mohammad Soud A. AL-Awan. (2018). The Effectiveness of Neurological Impress Method on Reading Fluency of Students with Learning Disabilities in Amman, Jordan. International Education Studies, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n1p165

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Row of the Two Way ANOVA table (Table 5) for the interaction term in the same 40-student post-measurement analysis. The printed significance of 0.311 exceeds the 0.05 level; no effect size is printed, and equivalence was not tested.

"Group * Gender 0.05 1 0.05 1.058 0.311"

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Gender — moderator: an instructional effect differs by group

Related Claims¶

• No statistically significant interaction between instructional method and gender on scientific concepts acquisition — related
• No statistically significant group-by-gender interaction on science achievement — related
• No significant interaction between teaching method and gender on Arabic oral skills achievement — related
• Students with learning disabilities trained with the Neurological Impress Method showed significantly greater post-test reading fluency than a no-treatment control group — related
• In a Neurological Impress Method study, boys with learning disabilities outscored girls on post-test reading fluency in both the NIM and control groups, and the study did not show that NIM's effect differed by gender — related
• Gender showed no significant effect on achievement, and the group-by-gender interaction was not significant — related