Claims

No significant interaction between teaching method and gender on Arabic oral skills achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The teaching method by gender interaction on post-test oral skills scores was not statistically significant (F=1.435, sig=.237). → Nail M. Alhajya 2018

Evidence

Nail M. Alhajya 2018

Nail M. Alhajya, Sumaia S. Alzaghamim, Yousef M. Arouri. (2018). THE IMPACT OF VIRTUAL TRIPS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARABIC LANGUAGE ORAL SKILLS AMONG THIRD GRADE STUDENTS IN JORDAN. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(1), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.331

q3 · i? · causal · r1

ANCOVA on the 48-student quasi-experiment tested the Group*Gender interaction on post-test achievement. The interaction term was non-significant, suggesting VTM benefited male and female students similarly. No effect size is printed.

"Table 2 indicates that there weren’t statistically significant differences at the level of (α=0.05) in the development of Arabic oral skills among the third graders between experimental group and the control in the post-test according the interaction between students’ gender variable and teaching strategy variable. The value of F= 1.435 and sig= .237"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.