NLTS 2012 is the third in a series of federally sponsored studies of youth with disabilities under IDEA¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q1
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? NLTS 2012 is the third in the series of NLTS studies sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education examining youth with disabilities receiving services under IDEA. → John Burghardt 2017

Evidence¶

John Burghardt 2017¶

John Burghardt, Joshua Haimson, Stephen Lipscomb, Albert Y. Liu, Frank Potter, Tiffany Waits, Sheng Wang. (2017). National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012: Design Documentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/national-longitudinal-transition-study-2012-design-documentation

q1 · i? · associational · r?

Descriptive statement from the study's own overview page identifying NLTS 2012's place in the NLTS series and its population of interest: "youth with disabilities receiving services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act." No effect size is reported; this is a definitional statement about the study's scope and sponsorship.

"The National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) 2012 is the third in the series of NLTS studies sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education to examine youth with disabilities receiving services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Youth with an IEP are more likely than a decade ago to live in households facing economic challenges — related
• Participation in key transition activities, including discussing transition plans with school staff and student employment during high school, declined over the decade — related
• In 2012, youth with disabilities were more socioeconomically disadvantaged than their peers, more likely to live in low-income households and with parents receiving federal food benefits — related
• Youth with an IEP are more likely than in the past to receive supports at school but less likely to receive them at home — related
• From 2003 to 2012, youth with disabilities showed greater school engagement and support use but became less likely to participate in some key transition activities — related