Claims

Nationally recognized (NNSTOY) teachers are more supportive of student perception surveys than teachers without national recognition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the same regression, NNSTOY status predicted greater support for student perception surveys. → Robinson 2016

Evidence

Robinson 2016

Robinson, C.; Finefter-Rosenblum, I.; Benshoof, C.; Gehlbach, H. (2016). Getting Teachers Excited about Student Feedback: It's all in the Ask. SREE Spring 2016 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED567735

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Secondary coefficient from the same OLS regression in the split-ballot experiment: NNSTOY membership predicted support with "𝛽 = 0.23; 𝑝 < 0.001". The sample was recruited via NNSTOY snowball sampling. The article prints no standardized effect size (d or r) for this contrast, so impact is null.

"NNSTOY teachers were, on average, more supportive of student perception surveys than teachers who have not received national recognition (𝐵 = 0.41, 𝑆𝑆 = 0.10, 𝐶𝐶: 0.21, 0.46; 𝛽 = 0.23; 𝑝 < 0.001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.