Claims

No significant age x acquaintance interaction on estimated success helping others learn Facebook

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The repeated measures 2x3 ANOVA found no significant age x acquaintance interaction. → Harvey J. GINSBURG 2016

Evidence

Harvey J. GINSBURG 2016

Harvey J. GINSBURG, Rebecca CAMERON, Roque V. MENDEZ & Michael WESTHOFF. (2016). Helping others use social media: age stereotypes when estimating learner's success. Psychology, Society, & Education, 8(1), 1-12. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1123456

q3 · i? · causal · r2

The omnibus repeated measures 2x3 ANOVA over six within-subject scenarios reported the age main effect and the null acquaintance effect; the article states "No significant age x acquaintance interaction was observed". No interaction effect size is printed.

"Results from repeated measures 3 (age) x 2 (acquaintance) ANOVA showed significant main effects for age, F(1.847,3.89.617) = 171.305, p< .001. No significant main effect was shown for acquaintance type, F(1,211) = 1.71, p= .193"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-age-acquaintance-interaction-success-estimates
title No significant age x acquaintance interaction on estimated success helping others learn Facebook
description No significant age x acquaintance interaction on estimated success helping others learn Facebook
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — harvey-j-ginsburg-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.