No comparable teacher-friendly instrument for assessing oracy existed before the Cambridge Oracy Assessment Toolkit¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr?·q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? According to the authors, no comparable teacher-friendly instrument for assessing oracy of the kind they developed existed. → Mercer 2016
Evidence¶
Mercer 2016¶
Mercer, N, Warwick, Paul, & Ahmed, A. (2016). An oracy assessment toolkit: Linking research and development in the assessment of students' spoken language skills at age 11-12. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.10.005
q1 · i? · design · r?
The authors' assertion in the article's abstract about the novelty of the Toolkit and its Skills Framework. They state that 'no comparable, 'teacher-friendly' instrument of this kind exists'; no systematic search evidence for this gap claim is reported in the supplied text.
"together with a unique Skills Framework for identifying the range of skills involved in using talk in any specific social situation. As we explain, no comparable, 'teacher-friendly' instrument of this kind exists."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-comparable-teacher-friendly-oracy-instrument |
title |
No comparable teacher-friendly instrument for assessing oracy existed before the Cambridge Oracy Assessment Toolkit |
description |
No comparable teacher-friendly instrument for assessing oracy existed before the Cambridge Oracy Assessment Toolkit |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mercer-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.