Claims

All meaning negotiation strategies appear in child EFL peer interaction except comprehension checks, which are absent

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? No instances of comprehension checks were found in either language, while all other coded strategies were present. → Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester 2020

Evidence

Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester 2020

Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester, Alexandra Vraciu. (2020). EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 449-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.3

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Coding of the transcribed oral production of 20 dyads at two data collection times found every category (clarification requests, confirmation checks, self- and other-repetition, positive and negative feedback) except comprehension checks, in both L1 and L2.

"No instances of comprehension checks were found in our data."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-comprehension-checks-child-efl-nom
title All meaning negotiation strategies appear in child EFL peer interaction except comprehension checks, which are absent
description All meaning negotiation strategies appear in child EFL peer interaction except comprehension checks, which are absent
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — elisabet-pladevall-ballester-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.