Claims

Time (two years) shows no significant effect on children's overall amount of meaning negotiation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2025: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? No significant time effect emerged for overall NoM across the two data collection times two years apart. → Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester 2020

Evidence

Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester 2020

Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester, Alexandra Vraciu. (2020). EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 449-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.3

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Mixed-model result for the general NoM category in the longitudinal study; the null finding is reported as no significant effect, and equivalence was not tested.

"Time does not show any significant effects, and, hence, similar amounts of NoM are found at the two data collection times, which are two years apart."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-time-effect-overall-nom
title Time (two years) shows no significant effect on children's overall amount of meaning negotiation
description Time (two years) shows no significant effect on children's overall amount of meaning negotiation
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
recheck_by 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — elisabet-pladevall-ballester-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.