Instructional condition did not significantly affect readers' predictive judgments of understanding¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The ANOVA on composite prediction scores showed no significant main effect of condition. → Wiley 2019

Evidence¶

Wiley 2019¶

Wiley, J. (2019). Picture this! Effects of photographs, diagrams, animations, and sketching on learning and beliefs about learning from a geoscience text. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3495

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Null result from the same 120-participant experiment: "no significant main effect of condition on perceptions of understanding, F (5, 114) = 1.30, p = .27". No effect size was printed for this finding.

"An ANOVA with condition as a between-subjects factor and the composite prediction measure as the dependent variable showed no significant main effect of condition on perceptions of understanding, F (5, 114) = 1.30, p = .27."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Readers in all conditions except sketching were overconfident, with the most overconfidence in the photograph condition and the least in the sketching condition
• Interest ratings were the only significant predictor of readers' predictive judgments of understanding — related
• Sketching and viewing animations produced the best understanding of a geoscience text, while the photograph condition produced the worst — related
• Sketching during reading yielded the most accurate comprehension monitoring, with significantly less absolute error than photograph, no-image, and animation conditions — related