Claims

Systematic review finds no consistent longitudinal change in medical student attendance at in-person teaching sessions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2030: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across 12 included studies, no consistent change in attendance was found: one study showed a significant increase, five a decrease, and six no significant difference. → Nagappan Palaniappan Ganesh 2025

Evidence

Nagappan Palaniappan Ganesh 2025

Nagappan Palaniappan Ganesh, Tan Sapphire Rou Xi, Absar Shazia, Brown Samuel, Sayers Sarah, McManus Alex, Arora Anmol, Kuhn Isla, Khan Faris, Lau Edward, Tulinius Charlotte. (2025). Changes in medical student attendance at in-person teaching sessions: a systematic review. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091768

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Narrative synthesis of 12 included studies in a systematic review. The review reports "five studies showed a decrease and six studies reported no statistically significant differences", with one showing a significant increase; no meta-analysis was possible due to heterogeneity.

"One study showed a statistically significant increase in class attendance over the study period, while five studies showed a decrease and six studies reported no statistically significant differences."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.