No correlation between the degree of target error and degree of aim change in either group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i0 The correlation between degree of error and aim change was nonsignificant and small in both groups (Norwegian r = 0.08; Japanese r = 0.13). → Yamada 2025

Evidence¶

Yamada 2025¶

Yamada, C., Itaguchi, Y., & Rodríguez-Aranda, C. (2025). Unconscious cultural cognitive biases in explicit processes of visuomotor adaptation. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00335-0

q3 · i0 · associational · r1

A correlational analysis within the cross-cultural adaptation experiment found "no correlation between the degree of error and that of aim change" (r = 0.08, p = 0.09 Norwegian; r = 0.13, p = 0.23 Japanese).

"There was no cor- relation between the degree of error and that of aim change in both groups (for the Norwegian, r = 0.08, p = 0.09, for the Japanese, r = 0.13, p =0 . 2 3 )"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Japanese participants change their aiming direction more frequently than Norwegian participants, regardless of previous hit or miss — related
• Japanese participants change aiming direction frequently even after successfully hitting the target — related
• Japanese participants show larger explicit aim than Norwegian participants during visuomotor adaptation — related
• Implicit learning measures from verbal reports do not correlate with aftereffects or slow-process learning rates — related