Claims

Students' ICT literacy showed no significant correlation with their van Hiele level of geometric thinking after Geometer's Sketchpad instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pearson correlation between ICT literacy and mean post-test van Hiele level was r(14) = -0.01, p = .97, so the null hypothesis could not be rejected. → Poh Geik Tieng & Leong Kwan Eu 2013

Evidence

Poh Geik Tieng & Leong Kwan Eu 2013

Poh Geik Tieng & Leong Kwan Eu. (2013). Improving Students' Van Hiele Level Of Geometric Thinking Using Geometer's Sketchpad. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3). www.mojet.net. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086363

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Pearson correlation test on questionnaire data from the experimental group only (N = 16 in Table 7), using a 4-point Likert scale ICT literacy questionnaire of five items. The article notes "there is a limitation with the results given the small sample size."

"Results (as shown in Table 7) showed that there was no significant correlation between the ICT literacy of the students and their van Hiele level of geometric thinking in the posttests, r (14) = -0.01, p =.97"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.