Claims

Year Three students taught angles with Geometer's Sketchpad improved significantly in van Hiele level of geometric thinking from pretest to posttest on all three angle concepts

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 The experimental group's van Hiele level improved significantly for right angles (effect size 0.38), acute angles (0.62), and obtuse angles (0.91) after six Geometer's Sketchpad lessons. → Poh Geik Tieng & Leong Kwan Eu 2013

Evidence

Poh Geik Tieng & Leong Kwan Eu 2013

Poh Geik Tieng & Leong Kwan Eu. (2013). Improving Students' Van Hiele Level Of Geometric Thinking Using Geometer's Sketchpad. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3). www.mojet.net. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086363

q2 · i3 · causal · r2

Paired samples t-tests in the findings section for the experimental group (n = 16) across three pre/post tests. Obtuse angles showed "The effect size is 0.91"; right angles t(15) = 3.00, p = .01, effect size 0.38; acute angles t(15) = 4.98, p < .01, effect size 0.62.

"The paired samples t-test analysis showed that the students' van Hiele level of geometric thinking on obtuse angles after the intervention using Geometer's Sketchpad ( M = 2.00, SD = 0.00) was significantly higher than the students' van Hiele level of geometric thinking regarding obtuse angles before the intervention"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.