Year Three students taught angles with Geometer's Sketchpad improved significantly in van Hiele level of geometric thinking from pretest to posttest on all three angle concepts¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 The experimental group's van Hiele level improved significantly for right angles (effect size 0.38), acute angles (0.62), and obtuse angles (0.91) after six Geometer's Sketchpad lessons. → Poh Geik Tieng & Leong Kwan Eu 2013
Evidence¶
Poh Geik Tieng & Leong Kwan Eu 2013¶
Poh Geik Tieng & Leong Kwan Eu. (2013). Improving Students' Van Hiele Level Of Geometric Thinking Using Geometer's Sketchpad. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3). www.mojet.net. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086363
q2 · i3 · causal · r2
Paired samples t-tests in the findings section for the experimental group (n = 16) across three pre/post tests. Obtuse angles showed "The effect size is 0.91"; right angles t(15) = 3.00, p = .01, effect size 0.38; acute angles t(15) = 4.98, p < .01, effect size 0.62.
"The paired samples t-test analysis showed that the students' van Hiele level of geometric thinking on obtuse angles after the intervention using Geometer's Sketchpad ( M = 2.00, SD = 0.00) was significantly higher than the students' van Hiele level of geometric thinking regarding obtuse angles before the intervention"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Within the experimental group, van Hiele levels differed significantly across the three posttests, increasing from right to acute to obtuse angle tests — related
- Traditional chalk-and-talk instruction also produced significant pre-to-post gains in van Hiele level of geometric thinking on all three angle concepts — related
- The two groups were equivalent in van Hiele level at pretest except for obtuse angles, where the control group scored significantly higher before instruction — related
- The GSP condition used researcher-prepared worksheets guiding students to discover geometric concepts by dragging and transforming shapes in a computer laboratory — related
- Experimental-group students' learning achievement and creative thinking posttest scores were significantly higher than their pretest scores after learning with the model — related
- Students' ICT literacy showed no significant correlation with their van Hiele level of geometric thinking after Geometer's Sketchpad instruction — related
- Post-test van Hiele levels did not differ significantly between the Geometer's Sketchpad group and the traditional instruction group on any angle concept — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.