Claims

Teachers' beliefs show no correlation with their 3D printing integration levels

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Cheng et al. found no correlation between teachers' beliefs and their 3D printing integration levels in science classrooms. → Ioannou 2024

Evidence

Ioannou 2024

Ioannou, A., & Gravel, B. E. (2024). Trends, tensions, and futures of maker education research: a 2025 vision for STEM+ disciplinary and transdisciplinary spaces for learning through making. Education Tech Research Dev, 72, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10334-w

q3 · i? · review · r2

The editors summarize Cheng et al.'s study of teachers' 3D printing integration in science classrooms, reporting "no correlation between teachers' beliefs and their 3D printing integration levels based on analysis of survey data and lesson plans."

"They found no correlation between teachers' beliefs and their 3D printing integration levels based on analysis of survey data and lesson plans."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-correlation-teacher-beliefs-3d-printing
title Teachers' beliefs show no correlation with their 3D printing integration levels
description Teachers' beliefs show no correlation with their 3D printing integration levels
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ioannou-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.