Claims

ICT-enabled learning may change beliefs and perceptions about girls' capacity and ICT's value

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2–r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-29 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Increased interest and motivation were found in most studies across all four approaches; the reviewers suggest this "may stem from" changes in perceptions of ICT and of girls' capacity, a tentative interpretation rather than a tested cause. → Liang 2023 q2 i? Girls' learning gain could be equal to boys', while their learning style or experience may differ. → Liang 2023 (2)

Evidence

Liang 2023

Liang, M., Lim, C. P., Park, J., & Mendoza, N. B. (2023). A review of ICT-enabled learning for schoolgirls in Asia and its impacts on education equity. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10178-w

q2 · i? · review · r3

Theme synthesized from the reviewed studies; examples include improved perceived value of ICT after 3D printing (Ali et al., 2019) and increased girls' self-efficacy with mobile devices (Aktas & Çan, 2019).

"Improved participation and performance may increase girls' interest in and motivation to use ICT to support their own learning. Such increase in interest and motivation we found in most studies incorporated four different ICT-enabled learning approaches in this review may stem from the changes in their perceptions of ICT and in girls' capacity."

Liang 2023 (2)

Liang, M., Lim, C. P., Park, J., & Mendoza, N. B. (2023). A review of ICT-enabled learning for schoolgirls in Asia and its impacts on education equity. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10178-w

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review synthesizes that girls may have different gaming experiences and motivations, spatial abilities, and reading strategies, and that differences associated with ICT self-efficacy may be reduced by granting more ICT-enabled learning opportunities (Tam et al., 2020).

"The studies reveal to the educators and researchers that girls' learning gain could be equal to boys', while their learning style or experience may be different from boys'."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ict-changes-beliefs-perceptions-girls
title ICT-enabled learning may change beliefs and perceptions about girls' capacity and ICT's value
description ICT-enabled learning may change beliefs and perceptions about girls' capacity and ICT's value
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
source_checked 2026-10-29
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — liang-2023, liang-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.