Neither URM status nor first-generation status moderates the intervention effects on retrieval practice outcomes¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In exploratory moderation analyses, neither underrepresented minority status nor generation status moderated the effects of intervention version on the Hypothesis 1-4 outcomes. → Lisi Wang 2023
Evidence¶
Lisi Wang 2023¶
Lisi Wang, Katherine Muenks, Veronica X. Yan. (2023). Interventions to Promote Retrieval Practice: Strategy Knowledge Predicts Intent, but Perceived Cost Predicts Usage. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000813
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Exploratory moderation analyses reported in Results: for each hypothesis, mixed ANOVAs added URM status or generation status as a third factor among the first-session participants. The article reports no moderation by either demographic characteristic; no effect sizes are printed for these tests.
"Neither URM status nor generation status moderated the effects of intervention version, hence we do not explore them any further."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Race and Ethnicity — moderator: an instructional effect differs by group
- Socioeconomic Status — moderator: an instructional effect differs by group
Related Claims¶
- Active learning narrows achievement gaps for disadvantaged and underrepresented students — related
- Utility-value interventions improve grades, with the largest gains for first-generation and underrepresented minority students, and can improve STEM persistence years later — related
- Background variables (need for cognition, test anxiety, mindset, puzzle experience) showed no consistent moderating patterns across the three experiments — related
- Sample characteristics (immigrant/minority status, L2 status, age) show no significant moderator effects, and several program and delivery features are also nonsignificant — related
- The overcoming-barriers intervention does not reduce perceived time-and-effort cost of retrieval practice at either time point — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-demographic-moderation-intervention-effects |
title |
Neither URM status nor first-generation status moderates the intervention effects on retrieval practice outcomes |
description |
Neither URM status nor first-generation status moderates the intervention effects on retrieval practice outcomes |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — lisi-wang-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.