Claims

No differences between student and staff tutors in focus on cooperation among group members

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 1995 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? No differences were found between student and staff tutors with respect to tutors' focus on cooperation between the members of the group. → Moust 1995

Evidence

Moust 1995

Moust, J. C. & Schmidt, H. G. (1995). Facilitating small-group learning: a comparison of student and staff tutors' behavior. Instructional Science 22: 287-301. https://link.springer.com/journal/11251

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Cooperation orientation ratings did not differ significantly between tutor types in either course (course 1: F = 0.47, n.s.; course 2: F = 2.91, n.s.); equivalence was not tested.

"Finally, no differences were found with respect to tutors' focus on cooperation between the members of the group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-difference-tutor-cooperation-orientation
title No differences between student and staff tutors in focus on cooperation among group members
description No differences between student and staff tutors in focus on cooperation among group members
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1995
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — moust-1995

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.