No differences between student and staff tutors in focus on cooperation among group members¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 1995 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? No differences were found between student and staff tutors with respect to tutors' focus on cooperation between the members of the group. → Moust 1995
Evidence¶
Moust 1995¶
Moust, J. C. & Schmidt, H. G. (1995). Facilitating small-group learning: a comparison of student and staff tutors' behavior. Instructional Science 22: 287-301. https://link.springer.com/journal/11251
q3 · i? · associational · r1
Cooperation orientation ratings did not differ significantly between tutor types in either course (course 1: F = 0.47, n.s.; course 2: F = 2.91, n.s.); equivalence was not tested.
"Finally, no differences were found with respect to tutors' focus on cooperation between the members of the group."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Prior field experiments found no achievement differences between staff- and student-tutored groups — related
- Staff tutors display more authoritarian behavior than student tutors in problem-based tutorial groups — related
- Peer tutors evaluated the group's functioning more extensively than staff tutors, and this behavior declined over curriculum years for both — related
- Staff-tutored tutorial groups achieve slightly but significantly higher marks than peer-tutored groups in problem-based learning — related
- Student tutors are rated as more cognitively congruent than staff tutors in problem-based tutorial groups — related
- Staff tutors rated higher on using subject-matter knowledge and relevance, but peer tutors rated higher on these behaviors in year one — related
- Student perceptions of tutors are generally positive for both staff and student tutors, with significant differences appearing in only one course and not consistently across courses — related
- Focus group data indicate student tutors show more social congruence, being more involved with the group and more open to student opinions — related
- Tutorial group size moderates SDL gains in PBL: small and medium groups gained SDL, large groups declined — related
- Student tutors refer to end-of-course examinations more frequently than staff tutors to direct student learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-difference-tutor-cooperation-orientation |
title |
No differences between student and staff tutors in focus on cooperation among group members |
description |
No differences between student and staff tutors in focus on cooperation among group members |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1995 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — moust-1995 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.