Claims

Student tutors refer to end-of-course examinations more frequently than staff tutors to direct student learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 1995 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Student tutors used the end-of-course exam more frequently than staff tutors to direct students' activities in the small-group tutorial. → Moust 1995

Evidence

Moust 1995

Moust, J. C. & Schmidt, H. G. (1995). Facilitating small-group learning: a comparison of student and staff tutors' behavior. Instructional Science 22: 287-301. https://link.springer.com/journal/11251

q3 · i? · associational · r2

On the achievement/test-orientation subscale student tutors scored higher in both courses (course 1: F = 8.06, p = 0.005; course 2: F = 10.41, p = 0.002); interviews report student tutors giving concrete cues about what to study for the test.

"Student tutors used the end-of-course exam more frequently than staff tutors to direct students' activities in the small-group tutorial."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id student-tutors-more-assessment-oriented
title Student tutors refer to end-of-course examinations more frequently than staff tutors to direct student learning
description Student tutors refer to end-of-course examinations more frequently than staff tutors to direct student learning
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1995
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — moust-1995

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.