Claims

No statistically significant gender difference in direct achievement of scientific concepts

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? There is no statistically significant difference at á ≤ 0.05 between male and female students on the direct achievement test. → Alelaimat and Ghoneem 2012

Evidence

Alelaimat and Ghoneem 2012

Abeer Rashed Alelaimat, Khowla Abd Al_Raheem Ghoneem. (2012). The Effect of Educational Modules Strategy on the Direct and Postponed Study's Achievement of Seventh Primary Grade Students in Science, in Comparison with the Conventional Approach. Higher Education Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n2p40

q2 · i? · causal · r1

ANCOVA of the direct post-test by teaching method and gender in the two-group quasi-experiment; the article reports no significant difference due to student gender or the gender-by-approach interaction. Equivalence was not tested; the article attributes the null result to identical abilities, preparations and social conditions for both sexes.

"the same table shows that there are no difference with statistic significance (á ≤0.05) about the direct achievement test due to student gender, interaction between the gender and the approach."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.