Claims

No statistically significant gender difference in eighth graders' conceptual understanding of electric circuits

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Male and female students did not differ significantly on the conceptual posttest after ANCOVA adjustment (F(1, 270) = .809, P=.369). → Ali Khalid Ali Bawaneh 2010

Evidence

Ali Khalid Ali Bawaneh 2010

Ali Khalid Ali Bawaneh, Ahmad Nurulazam Md Zain, & Salmiza Saleh. (2010). The Effect of Herrmann Whole Brain Teaching Method on Students' Understanding of Simple Electric Circuits. European Journal of Physics Education, Vol. 2 No. 2, ISSN 1309 7202. https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/13097202

q2 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA on posttest scores with pretest as covariate compared males (n=139, mean 9.48) and females (n=134, mean 9.76); the article reports the difference "was not statistically significant", and the descriptive mean difference favored females.

", F(1, 270) = .809, P=.369. The mean of the male students' scores was 9.4820; the mean of female students' scores was 9.7687. The difference between the two means (0.867) favored the females, but this difference was not statistically significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.