No group effects on learning and performance were found: a non-significant intra-group correlation¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? A marginally reported finding of the hierarchy study was that no group effects were found; the non-significant intra-group correlation suggested group membership had no specific influence on individuals' learning and performance. → Cress 2015

Evidence¶

Cress 2015¶

Cress, U., Stahl, G., Ludvigsen, S., & Law, N. (2015). The core features of CSCL: Social situation, collaborative knowledge processes and their design. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10, 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9214-2

q2 · i? · review · r2

The editors report this null finding from the Rhem et al. study as marginal; equivalence was not tested, and no effect size is printed.

"The non-significant intra-group correlation seems to express that the different groups did not have any specific influence on people ’s learning and performance."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Implementers within the same school share similar attitudes toward EBPs, with intra-class correlations of 0.06 to 0.13 across four attitudinal dimensions — related
• Fall clusters of coding-question students trend toward higher exam scores than report-writer clusters — related