Claims

No significant interaction effect of learning approach and discussion type on self-regulation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The interaction between learning approach and discussion type was not significant for self-regulation (F(1, 116) = .137, p > .05). → Yorganci 2025

Evidence

Yorganci 2025

Yorganci, S. (2025). The impact of synchronous online discussions and online flipped learning on student engagement and self-regulation among preliminary undergraduates in a basic math course. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10459-0

q2 · i? · causal · r2

The two-way ANCOVA on self-regulation found a non-significant interaction, F(1, 116) = .137, p > .05, "η2 = .001". The effects of flipped learning and synchronous discussion on self-regulation were additive rather than synergistic.

"the two-way ANCOVA result shows that the effect on the interaction between learning approaches and online discussions was not significant (F (1, 116) = .137, p > .05, η2 = .001)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-interaction-self-regulation
title No significant interaction effect of learning approach and discussion type on self-regulation
description No significant interaction effect of learning approach and discussion type on self-regulation
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yorganci-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.