Synchronous online discussions produce higher behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement than asynchronous online discussions in online math courses¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i2 Students in synchronous online discussion conditions showed significantly higher behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement than students in asynchronous online discussion conditions. → Yorganci 2025
Evidence¶
Yorganci 2025¶
Yorganci, S. (2025). The impact of synchronous online discussions and online flipped learning on student engagement and self-regulation among preliminary undergraduates in a basic math course. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10459-0
q2 · i2 · causal · r2
MANCOVA on post-test engagement scores (pretest as covariate) among 121 undergraduates found a significant multivariate main effect of discussion type, Wilks' Λ = .889, p < .01, "η 2 = .111". Univariate effects on behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement were each significant at p < .025 (Bonferroni).
"The results also revealed that the significant main effect of online discussion, Wilks’ /u1D706 = .889, F (3, 114) = 4.74, p < .01, η 2 = .111. The effect of online discussions was significant for behavioral engagement (F (1, 116) = 8.725, p < .25, η 2 = .070), for emotional engagement (F (1, 116) = 7.584, p < .25, η 2 = .061), and for cognitive engagement (F (1, 116) = 6.461, p < .25, η2 = .053)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Online flipped learning improves self-regulation more than online learning in a basic math course — related
- Asynchronous lessons were rated higher than synchronous lessons on the POET-O — reports the opposite
- Synchronous online discussions improve self-regulation more than asynchronous online discussions — related
- Combining synchronous online discussion with online flipped learning yields an interaction effect on behavioral and cognitive engagement — related
- No significant main effect of learning approach on behavioral, emotional, or cognitive engagement — related
- Students communicate more frequently but with lower-quality content in the synchronous chat room than in the asynchronous discussion forum — related
- No significant interaction effect of learning approach and discussion type on self-regulation — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
synchronous-discussion-increases-engagement |
title |
Synchronous online discussions produce higher behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement than asynchronous online discussions in online math courses |
description |
Synchronous online discussions produce higher behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement than asynchronous online discussions in online math courses |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — yorganci-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.