No educator wellbeing initiative has been evaluated in multiple RCTs, so Level I evidence is unavailable¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The review found no initiative had been the subject of multiple RCTs, precluding a Level I systematic review of efficacy. → Emily Berger 2022
Evidence¶
Emily Berger 2022¶
Emily Berger, Andrea Reupert, Timothy C. H. Campbell, Zoe Morris, Marie Hammer, Zane Diamond, Rochelle Hine, Pamela Patrick, Chantel Fathers. (2022). A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Wellbeing Initiatives for Schoolteachers and Early Childhood Educators. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09690-5
q3 · i? · review · r3
The review's appraisal of 23 studies using NHMRC evidence levels found seven RCTs (Level II), three pseudo-randomised trials (III-1), five studies with non-randomised same-population controls (III-2), four with different-population controls (III-3), and one Level IV case series; "no educator wellbeing initiatives have been the subject of multiple RCTs".
"Furthermore, the review showed that no educator wellbeing initiatives have been the subject of multiple RCTs, which precludes the possibility of conducting a systematic review to establish Level I evidence."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Some social-emotional and cognitive-behavioural initiatives showed no effect or a negative effect on educator wellbeing — related
- Mindfulness-based wellbeing initiatives have a positive effect on the wellbeing of primary and secondary educators — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-level-i-evidence-educator-wellbeing-initiatives |
title |
No educator wellbeing initiative has been evaluated in multiple RCTs, so Level I evidence is unavailable |
description |
No educator wellbeing initiative has been evaluated in multiple RCTs, so Level I evidence is unavailable |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — emily-berger-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.