No statistically significant pre-test sensitization interaction with the CBS treatment was found¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Comparing post-test results of pre-tested and non-pre-tested group pairs showed no interaction between the pre-test and the CBS treatment. → Mihindo W. Jane 2017

Evidence¶

Mihindo W. Jane 2017¶

Mihindo W. Jane, Wachanga S.W. & Anditi Z. O. (2017). Effects of Computer-Based Simulations Teaching Approach on Students’ Achievement in the Learning of Chemistry among Secondary School Students in Nakuru Sub County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(5). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133108

q2 · i? · causal · r2

In the Solomon Four design, if the pre-test had a practice or sensitization effect, pre-tested groups would show higher post-tests; the article reports the comparison "did not show any interaction between the pre-test and the CBS". Pre-test equivalence of E1 and C1 was also confirmed (t(84)=-1.451, p>0.05).

"A comparison of the post-test results of the two sets of groups did not show any interaction between the pre-test and the CBS."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Solomon four-group pilot found significant pre-post gains from EPIGAME play with no testing effects and no pretest-by-treatment interaction — related
• No significant interaction of treatment and pre-test on participants' achievement in the critical thinking module study — related