No previously validated GenAI perception or readiness instrument was designed for both instructors and students in AI-enhanced higher education¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Prior instruments targeted students or instructors separately, were situated in single institutional contexts, or lacked formal validity evidence, leaving a gap the GenAI-RP Scale addresses. → Stella Y. Kim 2026
Evidence¶
Stella Y. Kim 2026¶
Stella Y. Kim, Ji Yae Bong, Daniel Maxwell, Beth Oyarzun. (2026). Development and validation of Generative Artificial Intelligence Readiness and Perception (GenAI-RP) Scale for faculty and students in higher education. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10713-z
q1 · i? · design · r2
This is the authors' literature-review assertion, not a tested result: the review reports that prior instruments such as Chan and Zhou's EVT-based scale and Luo and Zou's ChatGPT readiness scale used student-only samples, while Amani et al.'s dual-population survey reported no formal construct map or validity estimates.
"To our knowledge, no measurement scale has been developed specifically for both instructors and students in the context of AI-enhanced education. The current literature tends to focus on either instructors (Akanzire et al., 2025; Zhang & Villanueva, 2023) or students (Lemke et al., 2023), rather than both."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The GenAI-RTS is supported by a five-factor structure in which Strategic reliance comprises Deliberate Use and Critical Evaluation facets alongside Instrumental, Dependent, and Dialogic factors — related
- Prior research identifies motivational, cognitive, affective, contextual, and ethical factors influencing GenAI adoption among instructors and students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-prior-genai-scale-for-both-faculty-and-students |
title |
No previously validated GenAI perception or readiness instrument was designed for both instructors and students in AI-enhanced higher education |
description |
No previously validated GenAI perception or readiness instrument was designed for both instructors and students in AI-enhanced higher education |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — stella-y-kim-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.