Maltreated and nonmaltreated adolescents show similar reaction times on go trials of the go/no go task¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A one-way ANOVA found no significant group difference in average reaction time on go trials. → Bruce 2022
Evidence¶
Bruce 2022¶
Bruce, J., & Kim, H. K. (2022). Behavioral and Electrophysiological Indices of Inhibitory Control in Maltreated Adolescents and Nonmaltreated Adolescents. Development and Psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420001819
q3 · i? · associational · r3
One-way ANOVA on go-trial reaction time in 230 adolescents (Table 3: F(1, 228) = 0.20, partial η2 = .00). The article reports "the groups demonstrated similar reaction times on the go trials"; no effect size is printed for this null finding.
"A one-way ANOVA was conducted to examine average reaction time on the go trials with group (maltreated and nonmaltreated) as the between-subjects factor. The main effect of group was not significant, as the groups demonstrated similar reaction times on the go trials."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Nonmaltreated adolescents are more accurate than maltreated adolescents on a go/no go task, with the group difference more pronounced on no go trials requiring inhibitory control — related
- Maltreated and nonmaltreated adolescents do not differ in P3 amplitude during the go/no go task — related
- Maltreated adolescents show a reversed N2 pattern during go/no go: more pronounced N2 on go trials than no go trials, unlike nonmaltreated adolescents — related
- Both maltreated and nonmaltreated adolescents are less accurate on no go trials than go trials, with a large trial-type effect — related
- Reward does not alter the speed or variability of response execution in either stop signal task — related
- Go-trial response times are slower during the stop-signal task than the no-tone task, with no diagnostic group difference — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-reaction-time-difference-go-trials-groups |
title |
Maltreated and nonmaltreated adolescents show similar reaction times on go trials of the go/no go task |
description |
Maltreated and nonmaltreated adolescents show similar reaction times on go trials of the go/no go task |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
recheck_by |
2027 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — bruce-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.