Maltreated and nonmaltreated adolescents do not differ in P3 amplitude during the go/no go task¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The main effect of group on P3 peak amplitude was not significant, although both groups showed a more positive P3 on no go than go trials. → Bruce 2022
Evidence¶
Bruce 2022¶
Bruce, J., & Kim, H. K. (2022). Behavioral and Electrophysiological Indices of Inhibitory Control in Maltreated Adolescents and Nonmaltreated Adolescents. Development and Psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420001819
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Repeated measures ANOVA of P3 peak amplitude in 212 adolescents: the group main effect was not significant (partial η2 = .00 in Table 3), while the trial-type main effect was large (partial η2 = .74). No effect size for the null group contrast is printed, so impact is null.
"The main effects of electrode site and group were not significant. However, the main effect of trial was significant, with a more positive amplitude of the P3 during the no go trials (M = 15.60 μV) than during the go trials (M = 6.80 μV)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Adverse Experiences — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Nonmaltreated adolescents are more accurate than maltreated adolescents on a go/no go task, with the group difference more pronounced on no go trials requiring inhibitory control — related
- Both maltreated and nonmaltreated adolescents are less accurate on no go trials than go trials, with a large trial-type effect — related
- Maltreated adolescents show a reversed N2 pattern during go/no go: more pronounced N2 on go trials than no go trials, unlike nonmaltreated adolescents — related
- Maltreated and nonmaltreated adolescents show similar reaction times on go trials of the go/no go task — related
- ERP amplitude shows larger negativity for incongruent and No-Go trials at frontal midline sites — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-group-difference-p3-amplitude-go-no-go |
title |
Maltreated and nonmaltreated adolescents do not differ in P3 amplitude during the go/no go task |
description |
Maltreated and nonmaltreated adolescents do not differ in P3 amplitude during the go/no go task |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
recheck_by |
2027 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — bruce-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.