The likelihood of studying on reminder-free days decreased more rapidly over time for reminded students than for control students (non-significant exploratory trend)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? A day type × day interaction showed Reminder Group study probability on no-reminder days decreased more rapidly than for the Control Group, a non-significant trend (b = −0.05, p = 0.061). → Lea Nobbe 2024

Evidence¶

Lea Nobbe 2024¶

Lea Nobbe, Jasmin Breitwieser, Daniel Biedermann & Garvin Brod. (2024). Smartphone-based study reminders can be a double-edged sword. npj Science of Learning 9:40. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00253-7

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Exploratory time-trend analysis of the between-group day-type comparison in the log-file study; the article reports "their likelihood to study decreased more rapidly than for students in the Control Group" with p = 0.061, which it calls a non-significant trend. No effect size is printed.

"for days when they did not receive reminders, their likelihood to study decreased more rapidly than for students in the Control Group (i.e., day type x day interaction;b = −0.05, 95% CI [−0.09, 0.00],χ2(2) = 6.86,p = 0.061)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students who received study reminders did not study more frequently overall than control students who never received reminders — related
• On days without reminders, reminded students were significantly less likely to study vocabulary than control students, suggesting overreliance on reminders — related
• In two studies of children aged 10–12 and 9–13, students were more likely to study vocabulary on days they received a mobile-app study reminder than on days they did not — related
• The short-term effect of study reminders on same-day studying increased over the study period — related