Claims

The short-term effect of study reminders on same-day studying increased over the study period

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The within-person effect of reminders on study probability grew over the 36-day intervention (b = 0.31, p = 0.046). → Lea Nobbe 2024

Evidence

Lea Nobbe 2024

Lea Nobbe, Jasmin Breitwieser, Daniel Biedermann & Garvin Brod. (2024). Smartphone-based study reminders can be a double-edged sword. npj Science of Learning 9:40. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00253-7

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Exploratory time-trend analysis within the same log-file-based mixed-model study of the Reminder Group; the article reports that "the effect of the reminders increased with time" (b = 0.31, p = 0.046). No effect size is printed.

"We also explored changes in the effect of the reminders over time and found that the effect of the reminders increased with time ( b = 0.31, 95% CI [0.01, 0.62], χ2(1) = 3.78, p = 0.046)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id reminder-effect-increases-over-time
title The short-term effect of study reminders on same-day studying increased over the study period
description The short-term effect of study reminders on same-day studying increased over the study period
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lea-nobbe-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.