Aggregated state emotions show no superior incremental predictive validity over self-reported traits for academic outcomes; traits corrected for states were only systematically correlated with criteria for enjoyment and somewhat for pride¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In semi-partial correlations with grades, intrinsic value, self-concept, and career orientation, self-reported traits corrected for aggregated states were only systematically correlated with external criteria for enjoyment and somewhat for pride. → Keller 2025
Evidence¶
Keller 2025¶
Keller, M. M., Yanagida, T., Lüdtke, O., & Goetz, T. (2025). How Similar Are Students' Aggregated State Emotions to Their Self-Reported Trait Emotions? Results from a Measurement Burst Design Across Three School Years. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09995-1
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Semi-partial correlation analysis of incremental predictive validity in the three-wave study (N = 161), with outcomes of grades, intrinsic value, self-concept, and approach/avoidance career orientation. The article reports traits were "only systematically correlated to external criteria for students' enjoyment".
"Overall, self-reported traits (corrected for aggregated emotional states) were only systematically correlated to external criteria for students' enjoyment and somewhat for pride."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Achievement Emotions — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Self-reported trait emotions were rated significantly higher than aggregated states for some emotions and timepoints (anger, pride, shame, boredom), but the memory-experience gap did not hold uniformly and anxiety showed the reverse descriptive pattern — related
- Aggregated state emotions converge substantially but imperfectly with self-reported trait emotions, with averaged correlations ranging from r = 0.391 (shame) to r = 0.608 (boredom) — related
- Most variance in students' momentary classroom emotions lies at the within-person level, yet person-aggregated state measures are fairly reliable (ICC(2) from 0.735 to 0.901) — related
- Within-person deviations of enjoyment and pride correlate positively with grade deviations (r = .12 to .55), and negative-emotion deviations correlate negatively (r = −.17 to −.44) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-superior-incremental-predictive-validity-aggregated-states |
title |
Aggregated state emotions show no superior incremental predictive validity over self-reported traits for academic outcomes; traits corrected for states were only systematically correlated with criteria for enjoyment and somewhat for pride |
description |
Aggregated state emotions show no superior incremental predictive validity over self-reported traits for academic outcomes; traits corrected for states were only systematically correlated with criteria for enjoyment a... |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — keller-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.