Claims

A minority of longitudinal studies (12%) found no evidence that temporality of childhood circumstances relates to educational and cognitive outcomes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Nine studies (12%) found no evidence for temporality. → Molly Grant 2023

Evidence

Molly Grant 2023

Molly Grant, Kane Meissel, Daniel Exeter. (2023). Promoting Temporal Investigations of Development in Context: a Systematic Review of Longitudinal Research Linking Childhood Circumstances and Learning-related Outcomes. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09734-4

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's fourth theme reports that "nine studies (12%) that found no evidence for temporality," retained as a distinct theme to preserve nuance in the reflexive thematic analysis.

"The final theme, no temporal effects, describes nine studies (12%) that found no evidence for temporality."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-temporal-effects-minority-of-studies
title A minority of longitudinal studies (12%) found no evidence that temporality of childhood circumstances relates to educational and cognitive outcomes
description A minority of longitudinal studies (12%) found no evidence that temporality of childhood circumstances relates to educational and cognitive outcomes
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — molly-grant-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.