Claims

Most longitudinal studies of childhood social and economic circumstances find evidence that temporality (duration, timing, or mobility of exposure) relates to educational and cognitive outcomes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-22 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across the duration, timing, and mobility themes, 66 of 75 reviewed studies (88%) found evidence supporting temporality in associations between childhood circumstances and educational/cognitive outcomes. → Molly Grant 2023

Evidence

Molly Grant 2023

Molly Grant, Kane Meissel, Daniel Exeter. (2023). Promoting Temporal Investigations of Development in Context: a Systematic Review of Longitudinal Research Linking Childhood Circumstances and Learning-related Outcomes. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09734-4

q3 · i? · review · r3

The review's own synthesis of 75 longitudinal studies, thematically analyzed via reflexive TA, reports that "a total of 66 studies (88%) found evidence to support temporality" across the three temporal themes.

"Across these three themes, a total of 66 studies (88%) found evidence to support temporality."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id temporality-evidence-88-percent-longitudinal-studies
title Most longitudinal studies of childhood social and economic circumstances find evidence that temporality (duration, timing, or mobility of exposure) relates to educational and cognitive outcomes
description Most longitudinal studies of childhood social and economic circumstances find evidence that temporality (duration, timing, or mobility of exposure) relates to educational and cognitive outcomes
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
source_checked 2026-10-22
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — molly-grant-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.