Claims

Embedded questions focused on recognizing feelings and appearing at the end of videos were ranked significantly less helpful

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 The Friedman test showed significant differences in question rankings (χ²(6, n = 19) = 16.653, p = .011); question 4 was ranked significantly lower than questions 2 (r = -.375) and 3 (r = -.396). → Núñez 2017

Evidence

Núñez 2017

Casañ Núñez, J. C. (2017). Testing audiovisual comprehension tasks with questions embedded in videos as subtitles: a pilot multimethod study. The EUROCALL Review, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2017.7062

q2 · i3 · causal · r2

Follow-up Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests with Bonferroni-adjusted alpha (.025) on the 19 experimental test-takers' helpfulness rankings; the two low-ranked questions measured recognizing feelings and appeared at the end of the videos without a focalising character.

"Wilcoxon tests revealed that embedded question 4 was ranked significantly lower than question 2, z = -2.311, p (exact, two tailed) = .024, r = -.375, and question 3, z = -2.443, p (exact, two tailed) = .018, r = -.396."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.