Claims

Embedded questions in video as synchronized subtitles do not affect SFL audiovisual comprehension test performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Test-takers with embedded subtitled questions scored no differently from those with questions on paper only (Mann-Whitney U = 203.500, z = -.147, p = .885, r = -0.023). → Núñez 2017

Evidence

Núñez 2017

Casañ Núñez, J. C. (2017). Testing audiovisual comprehension tasks with questions embedded in videos as subtitles: a pilot multimethod study. The EUROCALL Review, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2017.7062

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental comparison of 22 control and 19 experimental SFL students taking two variants of the same audiovisual comprehension test; the Mann-Whitney test showed "no statistically significant difference" and the article concludes the subtitled questions "did not have any impact on test performance".

"The results revealed no statistically significant difference between the test scores obtained by the control group (Mdn= 5.500) and the experimental group (Mdn = 5.000), U = 203.500, z = -.147, p (exact, two -tailed) = .885, r = -0.023, which indicated that the subtitled questions did not have any impact on test performance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.