Claims

Non-interactive teaching does not enhance long-term retention relative to restudy at eight weeks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Despite immediate benefits, non-interactive teaching did not enhance long-term retention measured eight weeks after the intervention. → Lachner 2025

Evidence

Lachner 2025

Lachner, A., Russ, H., Hübner, N., Sibley, L., & Scheiter, K. (2025). When Does Learning by Non-interactive Teaching Work? A Large-Scale Analysis of Learner Characteristics in a Classroom Setting. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10060-0

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

The IPD synthesis used a longitudinal design with a delayed posttest administered eight weeks after the intervention; the synthesis reports the intervention "did not enhance long-term retention" despite immediate gains.

"Results showed that non-interactive teaching resulted in higher immediate scientific knowledge and stronger under-confidence compared to restudy but did not enhance long-term retention."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id non-interactive-teaching-no-long-term-retention
title Non-interactive teaching does not enhance long-term retention relative to restudy at eight weeks
description Non-interactive teaching does not enhance long-term retention relative to restudy at eight weeks
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lachner-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.