Meta-analyses report a small but significant advantage of non-interactive teaching over control, with large between-study variability¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The review reports, citing Ribosa and Duran (2022), a small but significant advantage (SMD = 0.17) for non-interactive teaching over control across 23 studies and 62 comparisons, with considerable between-study variance. → Lachner 2025
Evidence¶
Lachner 2025¶
Lachner, A., Russ, H., Hübner, N., Sibley, L., & Scheiter, K. (2025). When Does Learning by Non-interactive Teaching Work? A Large-Scale Analysis of Learner Characteristics in a Classroom Setting. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10060-0
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1
Background meta-analytic evidence reported in the article's introduction: the article attributes to Ribosa and Duran (2022) an analysis of 23 studies comprising 62 comparisons, yielding "a small but significant advantage (SMD = 0.17)". The article is not itself this meta-analysis.
"Their results revealed a small but significant advantage (SMD = 0.17) for non-interactive teaching over the control condition. At the same time, the variance among studies was considerably large, as some studies produced non-significant or even negative effects"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Physics interest moderates long-term retention: low- and medium-interest students benefit from non-interactive teaching at eight weeks, high-interest students do not
- Language proficiency moderates the effect of non-interactive teaching on immediate monitoring accuracy
- Non-interactive teaching yields higher immediate scientific knowledge than restudy in secondary physics classrooms
- Non-interactive teaching does not enhance long-term retention relative to restudy at eight weeks
- Non-interactive teaching produces stronger under-confidence (metacognitive bias) than restudy immediately after learning
- Answer format moderates the adaptive teaching effect: with open-answer items controlled, immediate learning benefits also emerge — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
meta-analytic-small-advantage-non-interactive-teaching |
title |
Meta-analyses report a small but significant advantage of non-interactive teaching over control, with large between-study variability |
description |
Meta-analyses report a small but significant advantage of non-interactive teaching over control, with large between-study variability |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — lachner-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.