Claims

Meta-analyses report a small but significant advantage of non-interactive teaching over control, with large between-study variability

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The review reports, citing Ribosa and Duran (2022), a small but significant advantage (SMD = 0.17) for non-interactive teaching over control across 23 studies and 62 comparisons, with considerable between-study variance. → Lachner 2025

Evidence

Lachner 2025

Lachner, A., Russ, H., Hübner, N., Sibley, L., & Scheiter, K. (2025). When Does Learning by Non-interactive Teaching Work? A Large-Scale Analysis of Learner Characteristics in a Classroom Setting. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10060-0

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Background meta-analytic evidence reported in the article's introduction: the article attributes to Ribosa and Duran (2022) an analysis of 23 studies comprising 62 comparisons, yielding "a small but significant advantage (SMD = 0.17)". The article is not itself this meta-analysis.

"Their results revealed a small but significant advantage (SMD = 0.17) for non-interactive teaching over the control condition. At the same time, the variance among studies was considerably large, as some studies produced non-significant or even negative effects"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id meta-analytic-small-advantage-non-interactive-teaching
title Meta-analyses report a small but significant advantage of non-interactive teaching over control, with large between-study variability
description Meta-analyses report a small but significant advantage of non-interactive teaching over control, with large between-study variability
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lachner-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.