Child cognitive skills other than initial word reading (phonemic decoding, working memory, phonological awareness, rapid letter naming) did not significantly predict exposures to mastery¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Phonemic decoding efficiency, working memory, phonological awareness, and rapid letter naming were not significant predictors of the number of exposures required for mastery. → Steacy LM 2020
Evidence¶
Steacy LM 2020¶
Steacy LM, Fuchs D, Gilbert JK, Kearns DM, Elleman AM, Edwards AA. (2020). Sight Word Acquisition in First Grade Students At-Risk for Reading Disabilities: An Item-Level Exploration of the Number of Exposures Required for Mastery. Annals of Dyslexia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00198-7
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Model 1 of the crossed-random effects analysis tested five child predictors; Table 5 shows non-significant coefficients for PDE (p = .088), working memory (p = .709), phonological awareness (p = .155), and rapid letter naming (p = .902). The discussion confirms "the only significant predictor at the child-level was initial word reading skill."
"Our models indicated that the only significant predictor at the child-level was initial word reading skill."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Decoding — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Phonological Awareness — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- At-risk first graders required an average of 5.65 exposures to master a high-frequency sight word in a daily timed reading activity — related
- Initial word reading skill was the only significant child-level predictor of exposures required for mastery — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Phoneme awareness is a stronger predictor of reading development than rhyme awareness — related
- Semantic abilities indirectly predict word decoding efficiency in children with dyslexia via phonological awareness and rapid naming — related
- Phonemic Awareness Training Improves Reading — related
- Semantic ability correlates with phonological awareness, rapid naming, and both decoding measures in children with dyslexia — related
- The bidirectional letter-knowledge–phonological-awareness relation extends to supra-phonemic tasks, indicating an earlier developmental origin than previously reported — related
- Initial letter-sound knowledge and phonological awareness were not uniquely related to growth in each other — related
- Semantic abilities indirectly predict pseudoword decoding efficiency in children with dyslexia via phonological awareness and rapid naming — related
- Word length, vocabulary grade, and imageability significantly predicted the number of exposures required for sight word mastery — related
- Age predicts decoding efficiency in children with dyslexia while working memory and perceptual organization covariate effects are non-significant — related
- Initial word reading skill interacted with imageability: the poorest readers needed nearly 4 more exposures for low-imageability words than stronger readers — related
- Word reading task measures of O-P and imageability reliance predict intervention gains beyond vocabulary, phonological awareness, rapid naming, and auditory attention — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
non-significant-child-predictors-exposures |
title |
Child cognitive skills other than initial word reading (phonemic decoding, working memory, phonological awareness, rapid letter naming) did not significantly predict exposures to mastery |
description |
Child cognitive skills other than initial word reading (phonemic decoding, working memory, phonological awareness, rapid letter naming) did not significantly predict exposures to mastery |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — steacy-lm-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.