Claims

Child cognitive skills other than initial word reading (phonemic decoding, working memory, phonological awareness, rapid letter naming) did not significantly predict exposures to mastery

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Phonemic decoding efficiency, working memory, phonological awareness, and rapid letter naming were not significant predictors of the number of exposures required for mastery. → Steacy LM 2020

Evidence

Steacy LM 2020

Steacy LM, Fuchs D, Gilbert JK, Kearns DM, Elleman AM, Edwards AA. (2020). Sight Word Acquisition in First Grade Students At-Risk for Reading Disabilities: An Item-Level Exploration of the Number of Exposures Required for Mastery. Annals of Dyslexia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00198-7

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Model 1 of the crossed-random effects analysis tested five child predictors; Table 5 shows non-significant coefficients for PDE (p = .088), working memory (p = .709), phonological awareness (p = .155), and rapid letter naming (p = .902). The discussion confirms "the only significant predictor at the child-level was initial word reading skill."

"Our models indicated that the only significant predictor at the child-level was initial word reading skill."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id non-significant-child-predictors-exposures
title Child cognitive skills other than initial word reading (phonemic decoding, working memory, phonological awareness, rapid letter naming) did not significantly predict exposures to mastery
description Child cognitive skills other than initial word reading (phonemic decoding, working memory, phonological awareness, rapid letter naming) did not significantly predict exposures to mastery
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — steacy-lm-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.