Claims

Initial word reading skill interacted with imageability: the poorest readers needed nearly 4 more exposures for low-imageability words than stronger readers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? For low imageability words, students beginning 2 SD below the mean in word reading required nearly 4 more exposures than students beginning 2 SD above the mean. → Steacy LM 2020

Evidence

Steacy LM 2020

Steacy LM, Fuchs D, Gilbert JK, Kearns DM, Elleman AM, Edwards AA. (2020). Sight Word Acquisition in First Grade Students At-Risk for Reading Disabilities: An Item-Level Exploration of the Number of Exposures Required for Mastery. Annals of Dyslexia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00198-7

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Model 2 of the crossed-random effects analysis added interaction terms; the SWE × imageability interaction was significant (coefficient .001, p = .001 in Table 5). The interaction, plotted in Figure 1, shows very low-skill readers needed "nearly 4 more exposures" for low-imageability words than relatively good readers.

"Overall, the imageability interaction indicates that for low imageability words (words for which it is harder to conjure a mental image), students who begin the intervention with very low word reading skills (2 standard deviations below the mean) require nearly 4 more exposures to those words, on average, than students who begin the intervention with relatively good word reading skills (2 standard deviations above the mean)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id swe-imageability-interaction-exposures
title Initial word reading skill interacted with imageability: the poorest readers needed nearly 4 more exposures for low-imageability words than stronger readers
description Initial word reading skill interacted with imageability: the poorest readers needed nearly 4 more exposures for low-imageability words than stronger readers
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — steacy-lm-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.