Claims

Only two studies evaluated learning outcomes, with small improvements and very low to moderate certainty

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Only two studies evaluated the impact on the learning dimension (383 participants), with small improvements. → Fernandes Pimenta Isac Davidson Santiago et al 2025

Evidence

Fernandes Pimenta Isac Davidson Santiago et al 2025

Fernandes Pimenta Isac Davidson Santiago et al. (2025). Effectiveness of non-technical skills training in intensive care units: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07037-6

q2 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review of learning-dimension outcomes from two studies with 383 participants. The review reports "small improvements" with very low certainty for the NTS set and no significant change in situational awareness learning in the controlled study.

"Only two studies evaluated the impact on the learning dimension (383 participants), with small improvements."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.