Claims

No significant differences in science learning or attitudes between OpenSciEd and mySci eighth-grade classes in one small comparison

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A dissertation comparison of the OpenSciEd Earth and Space unit to a comparable mySci unit found no significant differences in science learning or attitudes. → McElhaney 2024

Evidence

McElhaney 2024

McElhaney, K. W., & Kamdar, D. (2024). Updated summary and synthesis of OpenSciEd research [White paper]. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/231

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, citing Vick and Blanton (2023), data from 44 eighth-grade students in two classrooms taught by the same teacher comparing OpenSciEd and mySci units. No effect size is printed, so impact is null; equivalence was not tested.

"The study found no significant differences in science learning or attitudes between the two classes on science."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id null-open-scied-vs-mysci-eighth-grade
title No significant differences in science learning or attitudes between OpenSciEd and mySci eighth-grade classes in one small comparison
description No significant differences in science learning or attitudes between OpenSciEd and mySci eighth-grade classes in one small comparison
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — mcelhaney-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.