The two teacher groups did not differ on released-math tasks; both groups made pretest-to-posttest gains, suggesting math-in-science-context tasks better capture OpenSciEd math reasoning¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? On released-math tasks, students in both groups made pretest-to-posttest gains with greater gains in fall, and the groups did not differ, unlike on math-in-science-context tasks. → McElhaney 2025
Evidence¶
McElhaney 2025¶
McElhaney, K. W., Hodkowski, N. M., McMahon, L. H., Jacobs, J., Penuel, W. R., Anton, G., Henson, K., Urban, R., & Parker, D. A. (2025). Promoting Mathematical Reasoning in OpenSciEd Middle School Curriculum Units. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/4ea4b3c5-c663-4484-8727-258bff346d2d doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/281
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Analysis of student assessment scores across the two teacher groups and three administrations found group differences on math-in-science-context tasks "but not on released-math tasks." The report interprets this as the context-embedded tasks better capturing the reasoning OpenSciEd asks of students. No effect size is printed.
"our finding that the Treatment and Delayed Treatment groups differed on math-in-science-context tasks but not on released-math tasks suggests that the math-in-science-context tasks better capture the kind of math reasoning students are asked to do in OpenSciEd."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Treatment-group students increased significantly more than Delayed Treatment students on math-in-science-context tasks from pretest to midtest and pretest to posttest — related
- No significant differences in science learning or attitudes between OpenSciEd and mySci eighth-grade classes in one small comparison — related
- OpenSciEd classrooms showed greater science achievement growth than non-OpenSciEd classrooms in one district comparison — related
- No significant condition differences remain at posttest: both approaches converge on MVC strategy and reasoning after both phases — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
released-math-tasks-no-group-difference |
title |
The two teacher groups did not differ on released-math tasks; both groups made pretest-to-posttest gains, suggesting math-in-science-context tasks better capture OpenSciEd math reasoning |
description |
The two teacher groups did not differ on released-math tasks; both groups made pretest-to-posttest gains, suggesting math-in-science-context tasks better capture OpenSciEd math reasoning |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mcelhaney-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.