Number sense measures are non-significant predictors of math once more robust predictors are included¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Non-symbolic comparison COV became non-significant when any visuo-spatial predictor was added, and no number sense measure survived with more than two non-number sense predictors. → Szűcs Dénes 2014
Evidence¶
Szűcs Dénes 2014¶
Szűcs Dénes, Devine Amy, Soltesz Fruzsina, Nobes Alison, Gabriel Florence. (2014). Cognitive components of a mathematical processing network in 9-year-old children. Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12144
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Forced-entry regression models starting from number sense measures in the same 98-child sample; number sense predictors lost significance as visuo-spatial and reading variables were added, and "None of the number sense measures proved to be reliable when there were more than two non-number sense predictors in the model."
"Non-symbolic comparison COV invariably became non-significant when there was even a sole additional visuo-spatial predictor variable (visuo-spatial WM; Dot Matrix; Spatial Orientation) in the regression equation."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Number Sense — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Symbolic number comparison accuracy is the only number sense measure with a significant partial correlation with math — related
- Phonological decoding, verbal knowledge, visuo-spatial STM/WM, spatial orientation and trail-making performance are robust simultaneous predictors of math in 9-year-olds — a broader claim this one bears on
- Non-verbal intelligence measures (Raven, WISC Block Design) are non-significant math predictors when well-specified spatial and memory measures are in the model — related
- ANS acuity correlates with later number sets fluency but does not emerge as a unique predictor once symbolic knowledge is controlled — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Sustained attention predicts number sense task performance — related
- Non-symbolic addition performance correlates with mathematics achievement in a new sample, surviving controls for verbal intelligence and literacy (Experiment 2) — reports the opposite
- Phonological awareness and verbal working memory are the most consistently unique domain general predictors of grade 1 math outcomes — related
- Kindergarten symbolic number variables uniquely predict grade 1 math outcomes over and above counting and domain general predictors — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
number-sense-non-predictor-of-math |
title |
Number sense measures are non-significant predictors of math once more robust predictors are included |
description |
Number sense measures are non-significant predictors of math once more robust predictors are included |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2014 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — szűcs-dénes-2014 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.