Claims

Infants exposed to the Numbers in Nappies programme showed a statistically significant increase on the BSID (III) Cognitive Scale from before to after the intervention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · no dated study recorded · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The intervention group's Cognitive Scale composite scores increased significantly after approximately two months of the programme (Z = -4.32, p < 0.01). → van Eeden 2017

Evidence

van Eeden 2017

van Eeden, R. & van Vuuren, J., 2017, 'The cognitive processing potential of infants: Exploring the impact of an early childhood development programme', South African Journal of Childhood Education 7(1), a499. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v7i1.499

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Wilcoxon signed-rank matched pairs test on the intervention group (N = 29) comparing cognitive subscale composite scores before and after the programme. The article reports "a significant increase after the intervention (Z = -4.32, p < 0.01)" on the Cognitive Scale; no effect size is printed.

"The results in Table 2 show that there was a significant increase after the intervention (Z = -4.32, p < 0.01)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.