Claims

Social–emotional functioning of intervention infants rose numerically from the high to the very superior range after the programme, which the authors attribute to added parent stimulation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · no dated study recorded · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The intervention group's Social-Emotional Scale scores increased numerically after the intervention, moving performance into the very superior range. → van Eeden 2017

Evidence

van Eeden 2017

van Eeden, R. & van Vuuren, J., 2017, 'The cognitive processing potential of infants: Exploring the impact of an early childhood development programme', South African Journal of Childhood Education 7(1), a499. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v7i1.499

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive comparison of BSID (III) composite scores for the intervention group (N = 29) across the two assessments; the article reports "numerical increases on all subscales", clearest on the Cognitive and Social-Emotional Scales. No inferential test on the Social-Emotional Scale is reported.

"There were numerical increases on all subscales for the intervention group after the intervention with scores ranging between 99.27 and 130.63 (Table 1). This was especially clear in the case of the Cognitive Scale and the Social-Emotional Scale."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.