Claims

Children perform better with written numerals than with base-10 blocks or dot arrays on multidigit tasks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 A significant stimulus condition main effect (ηp2=.21) was due to better performance in the numerals condition than blocks or dots. → Mix 2014

Evidence

Mix 2014

Mix, Kelly S., Prather, Richard W., Smith, Linda B., & Stockton, Jerri DaSha. (2014). Young Children's Interpretation of Multidigit Number Names: From Emerging Competence to Mastery. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12197

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

In Experiment 1's repeated measures ANOVA, the stimulus condition main effect was "due to better performance in the numerals condition" (numerals vs. blocks: p < .001; numerals vs. dots: p < .0001; blocks vs. dots: p = .65).

"a significant main effect of stimulus condition, F(2, 264) = 34.44, MSE = .03, p < .001, ηp2=.21, that was due to better performance in the numerals condition"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id numerals-condition-outperforms-blocks-and-dots
title Children perform better with written numerals than with base-10 blocks or dot arrays on multidigit tasks
description Children perform better with written numerals than with base-10 blocks or dot arrays on multidigit tasks
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2014
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — mix-2014

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.